I always find interesting the very sharp distinction some humans make between them and their non-human animal counterparts. Some people might very
strongly believe there is a huge difference in human and non-human animals. The
fact of the matter is humans are very much like animals—at least biologically. A
lot of today’s (and past) medical advances have depended on humans being
similar to animals in this way. It’s widely known in the scientific community
that mice and humans share virtually the same sets of genes, for example. A
classic proof of this is the 1940s study of penicillin in mice. Scientists
injected 8 mice with deathly amounts streptococci bacteria. Four of the mice
were also injected with penicillin. The four mice with penicillin survived,
while the other four died. As torn as I am about the fact that some mice died
at the hand of humans and the brilliant medical discovery itself, my point
remains the same: humans must share some similarity with non-human animals for
these types of studies to have any relevancy to humans. The distancing by
humans of other animals, in my opinion, fails to recognize the reality that all
animals are physically related in one way or another. A realization of this can
help us not only understand non-human animals a little better, but also help us
understand what it means to be animals ourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment