In this week’s readings, an excerpt that stood out to me
came from Peter Singer’s “Animal Liberation or Animal Rights?” He writes, “It
may be argued, the borderline between those who have moral rights and those who
do not will become blurred…If the decision to grant such courtesy status is to
be decided by weighing up the consequences of granting or denying it, we must
include in the calculation the way in which this enables us to put a fictitious
[divide] between ourselves and other animals.” I feel that both the rights of
humans as well as animals are equally important and should not be placed in a
hierarchy. Instead of “weighing the consequences” for what constitutes giving
animals rights or which social issue has more importance, we should look at
these issues with multiple lenses/perspectives and understand the
interconnectedness between human rights and animal rights. Then we can look
past the so-called “fictitious gulf” between humans and animals. Equal
consideration is important for gaining respect of a being’s inherent value.
No comments:
Post a Comment